Docs is the better way……
Some claim that decks are worse than documents for internal communication. They prefer written communication over presentations.
Advantages of documents
- More detailed and nuanced information can be conveyed.
- Encourages clear thinking and distillation of ideas.
- Better for asynchronous communication and decision-making.
- Allows for more in-depth analysis and discussion.
Criticisms of decks
- Often, they focus too much on aesthetics rather than content.
- This can lead to information loss when translating ideas into slide format.
- May require additional commentary to be fully understood.
- Can be difficult to digest without a presenter.
- Sometimes used to “sell” ideas rather than communicate effectively.
Arguments in favour of decks
- Visual aids can help break down complex ideas.
- Useful for live, in-person communication and storytelling.
- Can be more engaging and help with information retention.
- Effective for chunking information and highlighting key points.
- Better suited for certain contexts, like conferences or external presentations.
Balanced perspectives
- The choice between decks and documents should depend on the context and purpose of the communication.
- Some suggest using a combination of both, such as a written document with visual aids.
- Others propose alternatives like one-paragraph summaries or recorded overviews.
Additional insights
- The quality of writing and presentation skills matter, regardless of the format.
- Some companies have cultures that overvalue deck creation.
- But note there is a trend towards shorter sentences and more concise communication.
Overall, while there is an argument that favours documents, there is more to this debate, acknowledging that both decks and documents have their place depending on the specific communication needs and context.